git How to add a GitHub personal access token to Visual Studio Code

It is actually meant to be used with issues rather than pull request so that when we receive a issue we can assign someone to fix it. In a pull request, an assignee refers to a person who’s in charge of merging that pull request after getting comments and change requests from other maintainers. As for applications which can be released out to the world (e.g. mobile or desktop apps) my understanding is that they propose to use different model by using release branches instead of environment branches. We still do all work in feature branches and merge them back to master branch upon completion. Then when we make sure that master branch is stable enough i.e. we have already performed all testing and bug-fixing we create release branch and release our software. If there is a critical issue we first fix it in master branch and cherry-pick a fix to release branch.

• In a pull request, an assignee refers to a person who’s in charge of merging that pull request after getting comments and change requests from other maintainers.
• I think I’ve read there’s an option for that in GitLab, to push changes to GitHub automatically.
• We are considering moving to the github-flow but I want to make sure.
• The approach is good if we want to see each separate feature; we just checkout in the branch what we need to look at.
• It is actually meant to be used with issues rather than pull request so that when we receive a issue we can assign someone to fix it.

If your code is having multiple versions in production (i.e. typical software products like Operating Systems, Office Packages, Custom applications, etc) you may use git-flow. Main reason is that you need to continuously support previous versions in production while developing the next version. When the dialog prompted me, instead of using the app password, I asked to sign-in using the browser, which worked, for reasons that are beyond my understanding. Now it doesn’t ask for credentials anymore (I had to change my default browser temporarily, because the bitbucket account I use for work is not in my default browser, and the dialog try to authenticate using the default browser). When discussing, planning and resolving confidential issues, such as security vulnerabilities, it can be particularly challenging for open source projects to remain efficient since the Git repository is public.

Visual Studio Code is always asking for Git credentials

Also we have a develop branch where every developer merges his features. Sometimes we create a release branch to deploy our features in production. https://traderoom.info/gitlab-vs-github/ If we have a bug in the release branch, fix it and pull changes into the develop branch. If we have a critical bug in production, create new hotfix-branch, fix the bug and merge branch with production (master) and develop branches. According to official github documentation, Assignee is a person who is working on specific issues and pull requests.

I have found a lot over youtube and other pages but for gitlab.com which brought me a lot of problems as they were not working as it was trying to connect to gitlab.com. The one thing that requires a bit of setup in this solution is the mirroring. I think I’ve read there’s an option for that in GitLab, to push changes to GitHub automatically. You can’t deactivate pull requests, but that’s not a problem anyway. Unless you make an incredibly popular project, pull requests will be so rare it won’t bother you where they come from. It can be misguiding when you look at your favorite FOSS projects, making you think publishing FOSS will get you lot of contributions – this is the exception, not the rule, we’re mostly alone on our island.

Hot Network Questions

After fighting with something like this for a little while, I think I came up with a good solution, especially when having multiple accounts across both GitHub and Bitbucket. However for Visual Studio Code, it ultimately ended up as start it from a Git Bash terminal so that it inherited the environment variables from the bash session and it knew which ssh-agent to look at. The updated part at the end of this answer doesn’t really help you at all. (It actually makes you stagnant in your workflow.) It only stops things happening in Visual Studio Code and moves these happenings to the terminal. According to StackOverflow’s 2022 developer survey GitHub was the most popular choice among developers both for personal and processional use. By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

With GitLab, if you projects will be storage intensive then you will hit the 5GB limit pretty quickly. For CI autodevops looks mouthwatering and it being available to use it in free tier sounds great but I have never tried it. GitHub actions seems to have somewhat comparable features but as a beginner, I won’t be able to use advanced features anyway. SonarQube seems to be available for both so neither is a clear winner for me. A potential new user here and I’m curious if I should make the switch to GitLab as a newbie developer. At this point, I’m strictly querying about free usage – not for paid accounts.

On GitHub, what’s the difference between reviewer and assignee?

When required within an application using Git (e.g., Visual Studio Code) it will “magically” open the required dialog for Visual Studio Team Services credential input. Sorry if this bad answer has affected you for a long, long time. It has been a year now since this post was raised, but considering future readers and the fact things have changed a bit I think it’s worth refreshing. The approach is good if we want to see each separate feature; we just checkout in the branch what we need to look at. A similar feature exists in GitHub, but involves the creation of a special private fork, called “maintainer security advisory”. Find centralized, trusted content and collaborate around the technologies you use most.

The link also highlights that Git will use the Windows Credential Manager by default. Seems that this setting is not configured in your Git client (anymore?). As the commenter said above, it’s basically just each company’s answer to CI/CD.

I was getting the error “No remote repository” in Visual Studio 2017 in Windows 10, when there was clearly a repository on GitHub. A reviewer is someone you’ve asked to review the changes you’ve proposed in a pull request. However, explicit setting a reviewer for a PR was already done by assigning people (assignees option). You can also see a list of people who you are awaiting review from in the pull request page sidebar, as well as the status of reviews from those who have already left them. But if we need to show our work we create a release branch with a tag as late as possible. If later we fix bugs in the master branch we need to cherry-pick them to the last release branch.

Now I want to use the token to push/pull my repository from GitHub, in Visual Studio Code, which uses Git and the command line, which I have installed on my Mac. An assignee is someone who is working on a pull request. You can now request a review explicitly from collaborators, making it easier to specify who you’d like to review your pull request. Stopping automatic fetch doesn’t solve the problem because I pull and push several times in a day, and entering the app password everytime is just bad.

Cloning repository with Oauth is rejected with ‘not authorized’

• Both git commands are used behind the scenes in both pull requests and merge requests, but a merge/pull request refers to a much broader topic than just these two commands.
• I started using Visual Studio Code, and I was trying to save my test project into GitHub, but Visual Studio Code is always asking for my GitHub credentials.
• I found that I was able to solve this by signing out of GitHub then signing back in.
• The one thing that requires a bit of setup in this solution is the mirroring.
• Once PR is approved and ready for QA or direct merge, a new QA “assignee” is added.

Only in general, make sure that it is indeed using that deploy key when doing git operations. There should be a private part of the key configured somewhere. Ultimately, the choice between GitHub and GitLab depends on your specific project requirements, team preferences, and whether you value features like self-hosting, integrated CI/CD, and a unified platform. Evaluate your needs carefully and consider experimenting with both platforms to determine which aligns best with your workflow and objectives. When I do this I get errors of pre-recive hooks rejecting the deletion of protected branches. GitHub Actions – simple CI; GitLab CI/CD – configurable and powerful open-source CI/CD with integrations with different software and unique features.

Using an SSH key in GitHub

I had to Used this command git branch -m old branch name new branch name. I was deleting the remote branch in Gitlab via GUI and that was not helping.I tried deleting the remote branch by git on command line and it worked. If you are not prompted for your username and password, your credentials may be cached on your computer.

If I have a repo in both locations, there might be issues and PR / MR from both places. Handling that for a personal project would be difficult for me. There might be tools for merging issues and MR from multiple repositories but would that be a worthy time investment? I think not so an apples vs oranges comparison is a must for me. Right now I’m thinking releases would be duplicated to GitHub and code only in GitLab. Issues will be in 2 places but code will be in 1 at least this way.

I started using Visual Studio Code, and I was trying to save my test project into GitHub, but Visual Studio Code is always asking for my GitHub credentials. As of November 2024, for most projects there is not a significant differences between the two that would be a deal breaker. That being said below are some of the differences between them. At Github , by default, you do not have any private repos ( ones only you and your team can access ). Because this question may lead to opinionated discussion, debate, and answers, it has been closed. You may edit the question if you feel you can improve it so that it requires answers that include facts and citations or a detailed explanation of the proposed solution.

I’ve seen people use assignees to mean required reviewers, while the others listed under reviewers are optional. This does require adding required reviewers to both assignees and reviewers though. VS Code now has automatic GitHub authentication against GitHub repositories. You can now clone, pull, push to and from public and private repositories without configuring any credential manager in your system. Even Git commands invoked in the Integrated Terminal, for example git push, are now automatically authenticated against your GitHub account.

They are useful tools for code review and change management. GitHub now requires fine-grained personal access tokens (PATs) for most new workflows. Classic tokens still work if you already created them, but new tokens should be generated as fine-grained for better security. Obviously coding counts, but should reviewing be considered work as well?

Changing that environment variable in my shell prior to launching code . Caused Visual Studio Code to inherit the correct environment variable and voilà no more connection errors in the Git output window. GitLab Flow proposes to use master and feature branches too.

There is at least one GUI that supports git-flow for Mac and Windows SourceTree. It works well when you have an application that have a slow development/deployment flow. Start with a model as simple as possible (like GitHub flow tends to be), and move towards a more complex model if you need to. Some of the respondents indicated that they use git-flow in general. We need to configure VS Code to provide authentication on top of Git commands. In my case I was using a Bitbucket app password and it always asked me to authenticate.

At the end we have the release branch with tags that can help us to move between versions. Therefore, from Alice’s point of view, it is a “merge request”, while Bob views it as a “pull request”. Big difference will make if you will be pure Opensource project or not. Opensource projects can apply and qualify for the GitLab Opensource program. If you do, you get features worth $100/seat/month for free. Where GitLab vets open source projects manually (and annually), GitHub freely provides.

For an actual more complete and robust workflow, see gitworkflow (one word). We are considering moving to the github-flow but I want to make sure. You may just set the GIT_SSH environment variable to PuTTY’s plink.exe program. I pulled again, the Windows credentials popup came out, and the problems were solved. I still really struggled to find one place to get the info I needed. Plus since 2017, ssh-agent got the ability to prompt you for a passphrase only when you try to access a repository.